Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
○ Elsevier BV
Preprints posted in the last 30 days, ranked by how well they match Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications's content profile, based on 11 papers previously published here. The average preprint has a 0.02% match score for this journal, so anything above that is already an above-average fit.
Nephew, L.; Moore, C.; Garcia, N.; Parks, L.; McKay, A.; Abad, S.; Rawl, S.
Show abstract
Background: Black patients and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) face significant disparities in accessing curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including liver transplantation. This study aimed to develop provider-co-created intervention prototypes in response to patient-identified barriers and recommendations. Methods: A human-centered design session with hepatology and transplant providers at a large academic medical center was conducted. Prior to the session, participants were presented with barriers and preliminary solutions identified through an earlier human-centered design session with Black and low-SES patients. Using structured ideation methods, including brainwriting, challenge mapping, and concept voting, providers co-created intervention prototypes. Final concepts were synthesized from patient insights, provider input, and design methods using affinity diagramming and concept modeling. Results: Nine providers participated in the session. They focused on three key areas for intervention: inefficiencies in transplant pre-evaluation, inadequate social support, and information overload. Solutions included: (1) a structured triage pathway to standardize referrals and reduce delays; (2) a peer navigator model to guide patients through the transplant process; and (3) a multimodal transplant education roadmap to improve comprehension and engagement. These prototypes addressed both patient- and system-level barriers. Conclusions: Protypes developed through provider-led design, grounded in patient-identified barriers and co-created ideas, can yield actionable, scalable strategies to advance equity in HCC care. Future work will refine these prototypes through patient feedback and pilot them in clinical settings.
Friedly, J.; Bateman, L.; Berdan, L. G.; Casaburi, R.; Erdmann, N.; Felker, G. M.; Itchon-Ramos, N.; Keteyian, S. J.; MacIntyre, N. R.; OBrien, L.; Reist, C.; Rossiter, H. B.; Silverstein, A. P.; Taylor, E.; Pike Welch, H.; Yanez, N. D.; Zimmerman, K. O.; Make, B.
Show abstract
Introduction: A prominent symptom of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (i.e., Long COVID) is exercise intolerance with or without post-exertional malaise (PEM). PEM is characterized by the worsening of both symptoms and function following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. Individualized, supervised cardiopulmonary rehabilitation is considered a safe and effective intervention for many cardiac and pulmonary conditions, and has been effective in gradually improving function in previously hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. While traditional cardiopulmonary rehabilitation approaches appear helpful in some situations, the exercise intolerance symptoms experienced by many individuals with Long COVID may require a different approach, especially when attempts to increase physical activity result in PEM. No clear consensus exists on the optimal treatment of PEM, and no major studies have evaluated the efficacy in individuals with Long COVID of either carefully supervised, individualized cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs for exercise intolerance without significant PEM or activity pacing interventions designed to treat or prevent PEM. Methods and Analysis: The Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery Clinical Trials (RECOVER-CT) initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) included a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled platform trial (RECOVER-ENERGIZE) designed to assess two interventions in patients with Long COVID and exercise intolerance: (1) cardiopulmonary rehabilitation for patients without significant PEM and (2) structured activity pacing to prevent or reduce PEM in participants who experience the symptom. The intervention duration will be 12 weeks. The primary endpoints for the trial include the Endurance Shuttle Walk Test as a measure of endurance capacity for the cardiopulmonary rehabilitation intervention and a modified version of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire - Post-Exertional Malaise for the pacing intervention. Assessments will be completed at baseline, middle of intervention, end of intervention, and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention, and include physical performance measures and patient-reported surveys. Ethics and Dissemination: The RECOVER-ENERGIZE trial protocol has been approved by an institutional review board (Advarra), and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06404047). Formally assessing PEM and developing a structured activity pacing intervention delivered by local pacing coaches are novel features of this trial. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at scientific conferences, and communication with participants, patient advocacy organizations, and the broader Long COVID community. De-identified participant data will be made available through the NIH RECOVER data repository in accordance with NIH data-sharing policies. If successful, this protocol will provide accessible tools that clinicians can use to address exercise intolerance and PEM in patients with Long COVID.
Rajani, M. I.; Yaya, H.; Vandehei, E.; Di Passa, A.-M.; McIntyre-Wood, C.; Prokop-Millar, S.; Krzyzanowski, D.; Zhang, M.; Fein, A.; MacKillop, E.; De Jesus, J.; Frey, B.; MacKillop, J.; Duarte, D.
Show abstract
Background:Mild neurocognitive disorder (NCD) is a condition in which individuals experience mild cognitive decline but are independent in their activities of daily living. Due to the increasing number of people living with mild NCD and its negative impact on the quality of life, it poses a significant health burden worldwide. Thus, it warrants an urgent need for innovative approaches to address the lack of effective treatment options. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique approved for the treatment of various neuropsychiatric disorders, could serve as a novel intervention for mild NCD. It can stimulate deeper and broader areas of the brain implicated in mild NCD, such as the prefrontal cortex, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex. Objectives:This study will examine the feasibility and tolerability of the Health Canada and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dTMS coils (H1, H4 and H7 coils) in individuals with mild NCD. Secondarily, it will assess the impact of dTMS on cognition, mood, sleep, anxiety, brain activity (via electroencephalography), and blood biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation. Methods: This open-label pilot study will recruit a total of N=30 participants between the ages of 60-90 with mild NCD. Participants will be assigned to one of the three dTMS coil conditions (H1, H4 & H7) and will complete a total of 20 dTMS sessions over 6 weeks. Data will be collected before, during, immediately after, and one-month following the intervention period. Discussion: This pilot study will generate necessary evidence regarding the feasibility and tolerability of dTMS in mild NCD. This will be used to determine whether a definitive trial is justified and inform the trial procedures. In the long term, dTMS may address a critical gap in therapeutic options for mild NCD. Clinical Trial registration:The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (CT07038798) on June 2nd, 2025.
Krikorian, A.; Lecocq, B.; Le Pen, M.; Rollet, A.; Gouy, E.; Mura, M.; Metais, A.; Spiegel, K.; Pelloux, S.; Haesebaert, J.; Rode, G.; Schlatter, S.
Show abstract
Background: Medical and doctoral students in health sciences represent a strategic public health lever as future professionals who will have a lasting influence on healthcare practices and the overall quality of health systems. Impaired quality of life and mental health issues among these students, coupled with scarce prevention programmes, led us to develop PROMESS-Group, an innovative multimodal programme designed to promote healthier lifestyle habits among university students. Methods: We will conduct a 2-arm randomised, controlled, superiority monocentric trial to assess the effect of this programme on medical and doctoral students compared to a control group. The intervention will consist of six sessions covering stress, sleep and physical activity domains. Each session will include group and individual meetings led by trained peer experts, focusing on needs assessment, self-care education, and personalised goals setting. Students' quality of life, academic self-efficacy, and broader health outcomes will be assessed using validated questionnaires and objective tools at baseline, during, and post-intervention. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle and presented in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board (IRB2025021802). All procedures will be performed in adherence to the Helsinki Declaration. Discussion: This study will enable the generation of high-quality evidence to evaluate the programme's effects on students' quality of life and related psychosocial outcomes, and may inform evidence-based health promotion strategies in university settings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07030751 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07030751?locStr=Lyon,%20France&country=FR&state=Auvergne-Rh%C3%B4ne-Alpes&city=Lyon&cond=promess%20group&rank=1), 06.12.2025 - retrospectively registered. This protocol study follows the SPIRIT guidelines (Appendix 1). Keywords: Doctoral student, health behaviour, medical student, quality of life, physical activity, sleep, stress
Vickers, K. L.; De Wit, L.; Goldstein, F. C.; Thelin, J.; Giannotto, E. L.; Saurman, J. L.; Levey, A. I.; Rodriguez, A. D.
Show abstract
Background: Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) experience cognitive and functional declines that can negatively impact mood and reduce feelings of self-efficacy. These changes can also lead to elevated distress in care partners (CPs). Therefore, interventions that address quality of life and psychosocial factors in people with MCI and their CPs are needed. Objective: The present study evaluated the impact of a multidomain lifestyle program, the Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP), on changes in psychosocial functioning, particularly empowerment, in people with MCI and their CPs. Methods: Participants were 94 people with MCI (Mean= 75.1 years old, 45.7% female, 81.9% white) and their CPs (Mean= 69.1 years old, 71.3% female, 87.3% white) that completed the 12-month CEP program comprised of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial interventions. Questionnaires were administered pre- and post-program to assess empowerment, self-efficacy, meaning and purpose, depression, and stress in participants with MCI alongside empowerment, depression, stress, and caregiving burden in CPs. Results: After completing the CEP program, participants with MCI endorsed higher empowerment and self-efficacy as well as fewer symptoms of depression and perceived stress. CPs endorsed feeling more empowered despite elevated caregiver burden. Conclusions: These results suggest multidomain lifestyle programs can positively impact wellbeing in MCI. Future research should focus on refining delivery models, exploring integration with pharmacological treatments, prioritizing inclusion of diverse populations, and measuring long-term outcomes to strengthen the reach and impact of programs like CEP.
Faiola, A.; Villano, J. L.; Soroya, S. H.
Show abstract
(1) Background: Brain cancer is the ninth leading cause of cancer death in the US, with approximately 76,000 newly diagnosed cases annually. Studies show that at time of diagnosis, up to six-months post-treatment, 50%-80% of brain cancer survivors (BCS) report cognitive dysfunction. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has gained increasing attention as a persistent disability experienced by up to 75% of all BCS, which affects memory, concentration, executive function, etc. Studies show cognitive training with computerized gaming as improving cognitive function for patients with stroke, dementia, and Parkinsons. It is of significant clinical interest to develop innovative interventions that reduce MCI. Aim: To improve cognitive performance of BCS suffering with MCI by evaluating the feasibility, acceptability and effect of a Virtual Reality Cognitive Rehabilitation Training (VR-CRT) platform during four weeks of cognitive training. (2) Methods: We employed a quasi-experimental pretest/posttest non-randomized/non-blinded single-arm design for 4 weeks, with an experimental group (n=6, after attrition) using VR-CRT. Participants were selected based on convenience sampling using the electronic medical record to identify qualified patients, guided by inclusion/exclusion criteria. Feasibility was defined by retention as >80%, with usability testing using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and NASA-TLX surveys. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test, and Trail Making A-B (TM-A/B) test were used to measure cognitive performance, comparing baseline to post week-four. (3) Results: The feasibility criteria of >80% was met. All SUS and NASA scores were in the higher index, suggesting a high degree of usability, with low workload demand. For effect, the COWA findings showed a significant improvement (41.38%), with a paired sample T-Test confirming that the participants COWA scores improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.03), indicating enhanced verbal fluency and executive functioning after intervention. HVLT (combined) showed improvements of 18.75% for Form A and 11.32% for Form B, which also showed a significant improvement (p = .04) in the retention discrimination index from pre- to post-test. The TM-A/B test showed an improvement (25.97%), suggesting that the participants spent less time completing both parts A and B, but was not statistically significant. (4) Conclusion: This study fulfilled our aim to demonstrate modest to significant cognitive improvement using VR-CRT with brain cancer patients with MCI. Despite the small sample size, we believe the use of virtual reality will lead to important advances for patients with MCI, particularly the frontal lobe brain region, expressed in executive function.
Schmill, P.; Hudson, J.; Greenwood, S.; Chilcot, J.
Show abstract
Background: Psychological distress is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with reduced quality of life, treatment non-adherence, and worse clinical outcomes. Distress in CKD is also linked to difficulties adjusting to the demands of illness management. Despite this, psychological support remains inconsistently integrated within kidney care pathways, and existing interventions often lack clear theoretical specification and explicit targeting of mechanisms underpinning adjustment to CKD. Objectives: To describe the systematic development of iADJUST, a theory-informed patient co-designed digital psychological intervention targeting key cognitive and behavioural mechanisms involved in adjustment to CKD. Methods: Intervention development was guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. A structured, iterative process integrated empirical evidence, psychological theory, and patient and public involvement and engagement. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation and cognitive behavioural theories informed the identification of modifiable maintaining mechanisms associated with adjustment to CKD. Intervention components were mapped onto these mechanisms and refined through co-design with people living with CKD. Results: iADJUST is a six-session self-guided digital psychological intervention delivered over 12 weeks and supplemented by therapist contact. The intervention targets illness-related uncertainty, fatigue-related activity dysregulation, catastrophic what-if thinking, self-critical evaluation, and behavioural withdrawal. It integrates psychoeducation, cognitive and behavioural strategies, maintenance planning, and elements from acceptance and commitment therapy and compassion-focused approaches. Content is delivered through video, audio, and guided tasks and activities. Conclusion: iADJUST provides a theory-informed, evidence-based psychological intervention for CKD explicitly mapping intervention components to maintaining cognitive and behavioural mechanisms implicated in adjustment. Feasibility evaluation is underway.
Albalak, G.; Noordam, R.; van der Elst, M.; Drop, T.; Caneda Cabrera, E.; Oudendijk, L.; Lammers, G. J.; Gordijn, M.; Kervezee, L.; Exadaktylos, V.; van Bodegom, D.; van Heemst, D.
Show abstract
Background Insomnia symptoms are common in older adults. While observational studies suggest physical activity (PA) timing affects health outcomes, its effect on sleep remains unclear. We compared morning versus evening PA effects on insomnia severity and sleep quality in older adults with insomnia symptoms. Methods Eligible participants were aged 60 to 80 years with (sub)clinical insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score [≥]10). In a randomized cross-over trial, participants engaged in coached PA in the morning (10:00 - 11:00) or evening (19:30 - 20:30) for 14 days each. ISI scores were assessed post-intervention. Objective sleep parameters; duration, latency, efficiency, and timing, were assessed with a Withings Sleep Analyzer under the mattress. Subjective sleep quality was reported daily via smartphone app. Salivary dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was measured on the final day of each intervention. Results Of 37 participants (mean ISI 14.3 {+/-} 3.3), 27 completed the study (mean age 69.8 {+/-} 5; 63% women). ISI scores improved after both morning ({Delta} - 2.5; 95% CI: - 1.14, - 3.83) and evening ({Delta} - 2.0; 95% CI: - 0.63, - 3.38) activity relative to baseline, but were not different between interventions. Compared to evening activity, sleep midpoint occurred earlier with morning activity (03:40 vs 04:00; {Delta} - 20 min; 95% CI: - 31, - 8). No differences in subjective sleep quality or DLMO were found. Exploratory analyses suggested insomnia scores improved specifically in late chronotypes following morning activity. Conclusions While morning vs. evening PA timing did not impact most sleep quality measures, it influenced sleep timing. Larger studies are needed to define optimal and personalized PA timing for improving sleep.
Adhikari, P.; M, D.; Subramanium, V.; Krishna, T.; B, A.; Jain, C. B.
Show abstract
Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience clinically significant anxiety and depression in 65-85% of cases during active treatment. Current supportive care lacks personalized, real-time non-pharmacological interventions. Skitii is a novel HRV-adaptive music therapy system that uses continuous RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences) monitoring via a Polar H10 chest sensor to select music in real-time, targeting parasympathetic recovery (RMSSD >=30ms). Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation) at Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Mangalore, India. Adults aged 18-75 years with confirmed head and neck cancer (any subsite, Stage I-IV) undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy with baseline distress (HADS >=8 or NCCN Distress Thermometer >=4) will be enrolled. Participants are randomized to Skitii adaptive music therapy (20-minute sessions, 3 times daily, 3 weeks) or static music therapy control. Skitii uses a two-phase algorithm: Phase 1 (0-2.5 minutes) uses heart rate as a stress proxy for immediate music selection; Phase 2 (2.5-20 minutes) uses RMSSD to adapt music every 2.5 minutes when physiological state changes by >=20%. Primary endpoints are HADS-Anxiety score and resting RMSSD at Week 3. Sample size is 70 (35 per arm), powered at 80% to detect a 2.5-point HADS difference (SD=3.8, alpha=0.05, 15% dropout). Analysis is ANCOVA, intent-to-treat. Discussion: This is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating RMSSD-based adaptive music therapy in cancer patients. The active control design isolates the effect of the adaptive algorithm from music exposure alone. If positive, results will support a scalable, cost-effective supportive care intervention with objective physiological monitoring, and provide the clinical evidence base for CDSCO Class B medical device approval for Skitii in India, with future CE Mark and FDA applications planned. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry - India CTRI CTRI/2025/11/116732
Saxe, G.; Shubov, A.; Smith, C. N.; Golshan, S.; Shekhtman, T.; Wilson, S.; Slater, D.; Bair, Z. J.; Beathard, C.; Davis, R. A.; MacElhern, L.; Kao, L. K.; Senowitz, P.; Gosnell, N.; Buchholz, D.; Aguilar-Carreno, H.
Show abstract
Use of fungal mycelia, which has antiviral properties, constitutes a novel strategy for addressing existing and newly emerging viral diseases. We evaluated safety and feasibility of fungal mycelia (Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor, FoTv) for treatment of COVID-19 and assessed its antiviral effects and potential to reduce symptoms. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dual site (UCSD/UCLA medical centers) clinical trial we examined non-hospitalized patients who contracted mild-to-moderate COVID-19 [≤] 96 hours, and experienced symptom onset [≤] nine days, before enrollment. FoTv was safe, well-tolerated, and feasible for COVID-19 treatment. Minor differences in biochemical markers were observed between groups (26 FoTv, 24 Placebo). FoTv significantly reduced the number and severity of symptoms, particularly sore throat/cough, and in vitro SARS-CoV-2 (pseudovirus) cellular infection. In conclusion, FoTv was safe and reduced COVID-19 symptoms and cellular viral infection. Future studies should investigate therapeutic benefits of fungal mycelia for SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses. Clinicaltrials.gov registration:NCT04667247.
Noguchi, T.; Erhua, S.; Hayashi, T.
Show abstract
Background and Objectives: Arts and cultural engagement may contribute to well-being in later life. However, evidence from longitudinal studies from Asia, including Japan, remains limited. This study examined the association of arts and cultural engagement with subsequent multidimensional well-being among older adults in Japan, one of the fastest-aging countries. Research Design and Methods: This longitudinal study used panel data from 354 individuals aged 60 and older (mean age 74.0 years; 78.6% women) who completed self-administered questionnaires by mail between 2022 and 2024. The PERMA-Profiler was used to assess five multifaceted aspects of psychological well-being: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. Frequencies of arts and cultural engagement at baseline were measured for active (e.g., activities by individuals and participation in groups, such as music and painting) and receptive (e.g., visiting museums, galleries, and theaters) forms. Results: Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for the covariates including baseline PERMA scores, showed that higher frequencies of active engagement were positively associated with higher PERMA scores for all domains. Higher frequencies of receptive engagement were associated with the domains of positive emotion, meaning, and accomplishment, but not clearly associated with engagement and relationships. Restricted cubic spline analyses suggested clearer positive frequency-response patterns for active engagement than for receptive engagement. Discussion and Implications: Arts and cultural engagement, both active and receptive forms, was associated with subsequent multiple aspects of well-being in later life. These findings suggest the importance of ensuring access to arts and cultural opportunities for older adults to create, participate, and connect.
Zhang, E.; Tran, T.; Shun, K.; Tran, D.; Tsai, A.; Kwang, E.; DerSarkissian, M.; Kuo, T.
Show abstract
The Asian population in Los Angeles is among the largest and most heterogeneous in the U.S. This is true culturally and health-wise. Older Asians have differing risks for cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease, depending on their ethnicity, health literacy, and lifestyle choices. This pilot examines several of these factors in a small but diverse group of older Asian adults who attended community health events from 2024-2025. Self-reported and biometric data were collected at five such events hosted by the Asian Pacific Health Corps at UCLA. The pilot generated health literacy and lifestyle (HLL) scores for all participating attendees and explored how they relate to their socio-demographics, healthcare habits, and predictions of their own health data. Overall, there were significantly more females than males with higher HLL scores (p = 0.027). College education (p = 0.028) and "normal" ranges for biometric data (e.g., blood pressure, BMI, blood glucose, cholesterol) were related to higher median HLL scores. With a few exceptions, fewer than 50% accurately predicted their biometric numbers regardless of HLL scores, suggesting a disconnect between perception and reality, and that better provider-patient communication may help foster greater patient understanding about their chronic conditions. These HLL score distributions indicate that educational attainment, better awareness of one's health, and high health literacy are individual factors that may influence older Asians' understanding and potential approach to managing their health conditions.
Svihrova, R.; Marzorati, D.; Odello, T.; Monachino, G.; Staletti, T.; Tieben, R.; Luigies, R.; Bodewes, N.; Rutten, W.; Barrett, G.; Bhogal, A.; Wilkinson, T.; Tzovara, A.; Faraci, F. D.
Show abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation is critical for secondary prevention, yet long-term adherence remains low. We present CUOREMA, a new personalized mobile health system integrating self-monitoring diaries, wearable data, virtual coaching, and reinforcement learning-enhanced adaptive interventions to support lifestyle change during and after outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. In a six-month two-center feasibility study (N = 53, Switzerland and France), we evaluated usability, engagement patterns, and preliminary health-related outcomes. Attrition was high: only 19\% of participants used the app on more than 100 days, and questionnaire response rates declined from 55\% at baseline to 13\% at six months. Despite these limitations, exploratory data-driven analysis revealed three distinct engagement clusters (dropout, sporadic, and consistent), which were further supported by matching patterns in app component usage, medication diary adoption, and smartwatch wearing time. Engagement clusters were not associated with demographic factors; instead, psychological themes of patients' personal goals suggested that intrinsic motivation characterized sustained users, whereas extrinsic motivation predominated among early dropouts. User experience was rated positively, and validated questionnaire scores showed no deterioration over time. One center demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in 6-minute walking test performance, though the study was not powered to detect clinical outcomes and selective dropout cannot be ruled out. These findings highlight engagement variability as a central challenge in digital cardiac rehabilitation and suggest that tailoring interventions to individual motivational profiles may improve long-term adherence.
Leonhardt, R.; Lindemann, U.; Schneider, M.; Rapp, K.; Klenk, J.
Show abstract
Background: Wheeled walkers can improve safety during walking, but improper use may increase fall risk among frail older adults. No suitable tool exists to assess safe indoor wheeled walker use in this population. This study aimed to develop and validate a video-based expert assessment tool. Methods: Based on the literature and expert consensus, seven problematic indoor situations were identified, and an assessment tool with five safety criteria per situation was developed (maximum score = 35). Fifty participants (mean age 83.9 years, 64% women) from a geriatric rehabilitation clinic and a nursing home were video-recorded while using a rollator. Expert ratings were compared with nursing staff ratings, self-ratings, and the Timed Up and Go test to evaluate validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined from independent ratings by two physiotherapists and a repeated expert rating after seven days. Sensitivity to change was assessed after two weeks of rehabilitation, and feasibility by the time required for assessment. Results: The expert score of rater 1 at baseline was 28.5 points, and assessment required a mean of 17.5 minutes. Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98) and inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.80). Validity analyses showed the strongest association with nursing staff assessments (r = 0.74) and a moderate association with the Timed Up and Go test (r = -0.45). After two weeks, patients improved by an average of 2.38 points (8.4% of baseline score). Conclusions: The new instrument demonstrated high reliability, acceptable validity, sensitivity to change, and good feasibility for assessing safe wheeled walker use in frail older adults. Trial registration number and date of registration: DRKS00038358, 07/11/2025
Gao, H.; Shen, J.; Chen, D.; Mol, B. W.; Hun, W.; Liang, Z.; Bai, X.; Han, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Su, C.; Weng, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, D.
Show abstract
Abstract Introduction The ARRIVE trial first demonstrated that elective induction of labour (IOL) at 39 weeks in low-risk pregnancies reduced the likelihood of caesarean section (CS) without compromising perinatal safety; however, the generalizability of these findings remains debated, leading to uncertainty in clinical practice. The LIRIC trial aims to evaluate whether 39-week elective IOL reduces CS rates compared with expectant management, while exploring its impact on infant neurodevelopment and multi-omics profiles. Methods and analysis This is a single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial in China. A total of 1,074 low-risk pregnant women (nulliparous or multiparous) will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either 39-week IOL or expectant management. The primary outcome is the caesarean section (CS) rate. Secondary outcomes include a composite of severe neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality and infant neurodevelopmental scores (Bayley-4 and ASQ-3), among others. Data analysis will follow the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) principle. Biospecimen will be collected for metagenomic and metabolomic analyses, with results to be reported separately. Ethics and dissemination The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, and standardized infant developmental reports will be provided to participants to enhance study benefit. Trial registration number NCT07082530.
King-Robson, J.; Cartlidge, M. R. E.; Soreq, E.; Murray-Smith, H.; Harrison, M.; Horrocks, S.; Aimola, L.; Poole, M.; Mc Ardle, R.; Robinson, L.; Sharp, D. J.; Schott, J. M.
Show abstract
Background: Improvements in health technology offer opportunities for remote disease screening, diagnosis and monitoring. The Withings Sleep Analyzer (WSA), an under mattress ballistocardiograph sensor able to detect body movement, breathing, and cardiac ejection is a promising technology for the non-invasive detection and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. InSleep46 aims to evaluate whether the WSA is able to detect preclinical Alzheimer's disease in members of the 1946 British Birth cohort, now in their late 70s. Objectives: To assess feasibility of deployment of a remote sleep, circadian and physiological monitoring device in a population of older adults. Participants: 356 participants from the Insight 46 neuroimaging sub-study (1946 British Birth Cohort), all born in one week in March 1946. Methods: We describe remote recruitment, device installation, and troubleshooting protocols. Feasibility analysis examined participant characteristics associated with recruitment and successful device set-up using logistic regression. Troubleshooting events for device installation and maintenance were recorded over a mean 14-month follow-up period. Results: During the feasibility analysis period, 263 (74%) participants, mean (SD) age 77 years (0.47) agreed to take part, of whom 245 (93%) successfully set up the WSA. Recruitment and successful set up of the WSA were not dependent on cognitive ability, socioeconomic position, or educational attainment. 162 (62%) of recruited individuals required [≥]1 troubleshooting call (mean 2.3 per participant, range 0-16). 603 calls were required in total. Conclusion: Deployment of a remote sleep and physiological monitoring device in an older adult population is feasible. Most participants required individualised assistance to set up the device. For the technology to be widely implemented, the set up must be accessible, with dedicated support available.
Wei, M.; Liang, C.; Ruan, H.; Liao, G.; Peng, P.; Li, X.; Zou, J.; Liu, S.; Cao, G.; Yan, X.; Qin, M.; Huang, J.
Show abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Conventional reusable endoscopes incur significant expenses in the form of purchase, maintenance, reprocessing, and disinfection. Reprocessing is frequently ineffective even following the use of high-level disinfectants (HLDs). Disposable gastroscopy might be a strategy to decrease infectious outbreaks associated with reusable endoscope. The aim of this study was to analyze and evaluate the performance, efficiency and safety in gastroscopy observation and subsequent potential EMR procedure via the disposable gastroscope in a clinical setting. METHODS Patients who required gastroscopies and met the criteria were recruited to this prospective, open-label, non-inferiority study. After obtaining the written informed content, the enrolled subjects selected themselves independently to the disposable group or reusable group. The primary measure was to evaluate the acceptable image quality and whether the disposable endoscope devices could meet the basic clinical demands with a noninferiority margin of -8%. The second measures were to analyze and evaluate the image conditions, accepted endoscopic maneuverability, efficiency and safety of observation and advanced potential EMR procedure. Appropriate statistical methods were conducted via PASS software and SAS 9.4. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 90 individuals (the number of those in disposable group and reusable group was both 45) were recruited to this study. The success rate of acceptable image quality via photographing iconic anatomical sites between two groups was 100.0% (45/45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9213,1.0000) and the lower limit of the 95%CI (-7.8654%, 7.8654%) was larger than the noninferiority margin of -8% (Newcombe-Wilson score method). Significant differences were showed in the measures of image conditions (image acquisition, image quality, brightness, contrast and sharpness) and accepted endoscopic maneuverability (endoscopy body rigidity). No significant differences were observed in the field of knob operation, sharp angle adaptability, and the auxiliary features including air supply, water supply and suction. In terms of efficiency, the total operating time, insertion time and withdrawal time were longer in the disposable group. The En-bloc resection rate of those observed polyps and required to EMR procedure due to relatively larger diameter (5mm-15mm) was the same 100% in both groups (26/26 vs 23/23, 95%CI: 0.8713,1.0000). Nevertheless, the procedure time of EMR for each polyp was significantly longer in the disposable group. This study showed no intraoperative bleeding, delayed bleeding, perforation or other study-related adverse events among 90 patients. No dramatic fluctuations in vital signs were showed in perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS In consideration of the efficiency, efficacy and safety evaluation, the disposable gastroscopes might represent an alternative to conventional reusable gastroscopes in routine examination and endoscopic mucosal resection.
Hawley, P. H.; Wade, K.; Daeninck, P.; Fitzgibbon, E.; Kerba, M.; Goldie, C.; Kopoplovic, I.
Show abstract
Context Despite widespread use of medical cannabinoids for cancer-related symptom management, systematic reviews consistently call for more clinical trial evidence. Objectives This study aimed to determine and explore responses to medical cannabis extracts for cancer-related symptoms using patient-centred methodology. Methods An aggregate N-of-1 study of clinically stable but symptomatic outpatients from 8 Canadian cancer centres, comparing three blinded sublingual extracts (THC; CBD; 1:1) with placebo, self-titrated within a prescribed schedule for four consecutive days each in randomized sequence for up to three cycles (total 16-48 days). The primary outcome was the frequency of at least a 1.4-point (20%) improvement in a 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for at least one extract over placebo. Results The primary outcome was achieved in 50/89 (56%) participants (p<0.001), with no significant preference of one extract over another on average, but a clear preference between extracts for most individuals. Changes in a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment score and participant preference (n=91) confirmed these findings. Improved sleep, tiredness and anxiety contributed most to the overall improvement regardless of primary symptom. There were no demographic predictors of response. Mild adverse effects were common with all extracts including placebo but resolved rapidly on dose reduction/cessation. Moderate/severe adverse effects were rare but associated with THC. Conclusions Medical cannabis extracts can be meaningfully beneficial for cancer-related symptoms in approximately 50% of patients, particularly for sleep and related symptoms. A starting dose of 2.5mg of THC/CBD three times a day was well-tolerated. Personalization of treatment is required to optimize response.
Xu, Q.; Wang, S.; Sun, H.; Wei, X.; Zhong, J.; Cai, J.
Show abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate real-world adverse event (AE) signals of EV to provide evidence-based guidance for its safe clinical application. Methods: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the period of 2019 Q1-2025 Q3 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were utilized to mine safety signals.The time to onset (TTO) was evaluated using the Weibull distribution model. Results: Among 11,697,906 reports, 4,177 EV-treated patients experienced 14,511 AEs. The most common System Organ Classes (SOCs) were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (18.23%), general disorders and administration site conditions (13.17%).Multi-algorithm consensus identified 179 positive signals. Alongside known toxicities (rash, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia), potential new signals emerged, including dysgeusia, atypical skin lesions, and myelosuppression. Median TTO was 14 days, with the Weibull {beta} of 0.736, confirming an "early failure" profile. Subgroup analysis revealed toxicity heterogeneity: patients aged [≥]65 and females exhibited stronger signals for fatal severe cutaneous adverse reactions, while patients aged < 65 and males showed higher susceptibility to neurological and metabolic toxicities. Conclusions: The real-world safety profile of EV confirms known toxicities, reveals new risks (e.g., dysgeusia), and shows toxicity concentrated in the first treatment cycle. Clinical practice requires proactive monitoring during the first two weeks using demographic-specific strategies: vigilance for fatal skin toxicity in elderly and female patients, and close follow-up of neurological and metabolic indicators in younger and male populations.
Forbes, M.; Lotfaliany, M.; Miteku, B. M.; Yu, C.; Lacaze, P.; Isvoranu, A.-M.; Kang, M.; Nguyen, T.; Woods, R.; McNeil, J.; Neumann, J.; Mohebbi, M.; Berk, M.
Show abstract
Background Low-level systemic inflammation has been associated with late-life depressive symptoms. Whether individuals with higher inflammation derive preventive benefit from low-dose aspirin therapy is unknown. Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of the ASPiring in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Baseline C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured in plasma and depressive symptoms were assessed annually using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 10 Scale with elevated symptoms defined as CES-D-10 >= 8. Participants with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline were excluded. We fitted population-averaged logistic generalised estimating equation models adjusted for baseline sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates, including an hsCRP x treatment interaction to test effect modification by aspirin. Results Higher baseline hsCRP was associated with increased odds of elevated depressive symptoms during follow-up (OR 1.07 per SD increase in hsCRP, 95% CI 1.03-1.11). Low-dose aspirin allocation did not modify the hsCRP-depressive symptoms association (interaction OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10). Findings were similar after additional adjustment for comorbidity and other covariates. Conclusions In community-dwelling older adults during the ASPREE randomised trial period, higher baseline hsCRP was modestly associated with elevated depressive symptoms. There was no evidence that low-dose aspirin was associated with reduced risk of depressive symptoms among participants with higher baseline inflammation.